Search for: "WOLF v. STATE" Results 401 - 420 of 1,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by Mclarty Wolf
“[N]o two cases are identical,” the Court stated. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Suzanne Luban looks at United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 12:08 pm by Thomas Wolf
Wolf (@tomtmwolf) is Counsel with the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, which filed an amicus brief in support of the challengers in Rucho v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am by Russell Spivak, Benjamin Wittes
Code, entitled “Assistance to foreign and international tribunals and to litigants before such tribunals,” is, in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s words in Intel v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:41 pm by Kalvis Golde
This morning the court issued an opinion in Kisor v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Comcast v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Blog, Lisa Soronen remarks that Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  As Kersch comments, in both of these widely seen film series, “Roe v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Causes of action that accrue under state law prior to the filing of a bankruptcy petition, as well as those that accrue as a result of the filing, are property of the estate (see Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. v Alvarez [In re Alvarez], 224 F3d 1273, 1277-1278 [11th Cir]; Winick & Rich, P.C. v Strada Design Assocs. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Richard Wolf reports for USA Today that in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Hyatt, in which the court overruled a 40-year-old precedent and held that a state cannot be sued in the courts of another state without its consent. [read post]