Search for: "WOMBLE v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2023, 8:00 am by Will Korn
Rosenthal, United States District Court judge for the Southern District of Texas, and Reagan W. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
Notably, their application has been denied by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), and the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:52 am by Arturo Jara
The “V” initially stands out, but upon second glance, the “M” is revealed. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm by Phil Dixon
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:18 am by Joy Waltemath
Citing the rule of orderliness, which precludes one appellate panel from overturning the decision of another panel, the appeals court held that its second line of cases, which follows its 1989 decision in Womble v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Ken Womble, Fault Lines on Long Island case of People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
  ASARCO engaged Baker Botts and Jordan, Hyden, Womble, Culbreth & Holzer to provide legal representation during the bankruptcy. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” Merrily Archer v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 12:21 pm by Howard Friedman
Love, 2013 IL App (5th) 120273-U (IL App., Sept. 24, 2013), an Illinois state appellate court upheld dismissal of a Catholic inmate's free exercise claim, finding that he had not alleged facts suggesting that the denial of a meatless diet on all Fridays and Ash Wednesday substantially burdened his free exercise rights.In Womble v. [read post]