Search for: "WYETH HOLDINGS CORPORATION" Results 21 - 40 of 112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2014, 10:11 am by Robert Percival
   Justice Kennedy has been the decisive vote not only in Wyeth, but also in two subsequent five-to-four decisions holding that such lawsuits are preempted when brought against manufacturers of chemically identical generic drugs, a result that even Justices who supported this outcome agree “makes little sense. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:31 pm
 at *15.Holdings[1] The applicable version of paragraph (b)(3)—the whole of which subparagraph (b)(4)(A) refers to—addresses all patent term adjustment determinations, not just some. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
 With today's holding, this Court intends to clarify the confusion and quell the consternation related to waiver under Rule 1925(b) and the number of issues raised. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm by Eric Alexander
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004), was right on the Michigan statute where Desiano v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm by Eric Alexander
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004), was right on the Michigan statute where Desiano v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Richard Renner
The corporations and individuals from whom the SEC recovered the new available funds are Oracle Corporation, Wyeth LLC, Pfizer Inc., Wells Fargo Brokerage Services LLC, SJL Investment Management LLC, Irwin Boock, Stanton B. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Wyeth would both forgo marketing its own authorized generic during that period and allow Wyeth’s generic Effexor to come to market early” (emphasis in original). [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 7:22 pm
., McKesson Corporation, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, and Schwartz Pharma for California products liability. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:38 pm by Jeff Klein
Wyeth in which the Middle District of Florida applied Mensing and found preemption for a number of product liability claims for recovery but did not find preemption for claims of breach of implied warranties. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
 The court finds those claims unpreempted in light of Wyeth v. [read post]