Search for: "WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES"
Results 41 - 60
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Merrill-National Laboratories, 646 F.Supp. 856 (D. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Wyeth Laboratories, 580 N.E.2d 1220, 1228 (Ill. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 1994 WL 532091, at *1 (E.D. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 283 F.3d 315 (5th Cir. 2002), "at least with respect to the question of whether he has alleged a concrete and particularized economic injury; '[m]erely asking for money does not establish an injury or fact.' Id. quoting Rivera, 283 F.2d at 310. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Wyeth, 876 N.E.2d 740, 756 (Ill. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 12:38 pm
Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim thankfully went by the simple moniker Paracelsus, sort of the Cher of the 1500s. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
For some reason, we recently found ourselves comparing our favorite defenses to our favorite rock bands. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., appears to recognize that risk and cause are distinct concepts. 278 F. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., 607 P.2d 1339, 1349-50 (Kan. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, was (predictably) a class action for economic loss. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:15 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., 278 F. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004); White v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 283 F.3d 315, 321 (5th Cir. 2002), and Williams v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
We would all go down together!! [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
”[4] The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) acknowledges that estimating “risk” from low level exposures based upon laboratory animal data is fraught because of inter-specie differences in longevity, body habitus and size, genetics, metabolism, excretion patterns, genetic homogeneity of laboratory animals, dosing levels and regimens. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 385 F.3d 961, 963-64 (6th Cir. 2004); Flynn v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
We've been doing some research in anticipation of the upcoming ALI meeting at which the Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation will be voted on (we hope ALI members interested in class actions and the like will come out, debate the issues, and vote), and in the spirit of cross-fertilization, we thought we'd share it with our readers. [read post]
