Search for: "Wagner v. Davis" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2010, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Wagner Davis' assertion of a retaining lien is discussed in connection with plaintiffs' motion to compel infra. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"It was error to dismiss the first cause of action merely because plaintiff is not entitled to the declaration he seeks (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 334 [1962], cert denied 371 US 901 [1962]); the proper course is to declare in favor of defendants (see Holliswood Care Ctr. v Whalen, 58 NY2d 1001, 1004 [1983]; Mongelli v Sharp, 140 AD2d 273 [1988]). [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:36 am by David Bernstein
Wagner was willing to remove an antidiscrimination provision from the Wagner Act to placate the AFL, which wanted to use its new power to exclude blacks, FDR was unwilling to support anti-lynching legislation, and so on (more examples can be found in my Only One Place of Redress book)—and 1964, when a significant majority of the white public supported Brown v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:38 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Davis también fue uno de los defensores principales de la segregación racial en las escuelas,  y argumentó a favor de la misma en el caso Brown v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Isabel McArdle
Mr Justice Davis added at paragraph 55, that exercise of the rights in Article 10 and Article 11 (the right to peaceful assembly) carries duties and responsibilities. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am by INFORRM
Piepenbrock v London School of Economics, heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 4:37 am
Wagner Davis' assertion of a retaining lien is discussed in connection with plaintiffs' motion to compel infra. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On 12 June 2023 Nicklin J dealt with directions in the committal application in Davies v Carter. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., 763 N.E.2d 160, 164 (Ohio 2002); Wagner v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  The judges, Davis LJ and Warby J, released a short summary of their decision [pdf] – with a full judgment to follow later. [read post]