Search for: "Walker v. Majors" Results 1 - 20 of 845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Walker v Innospec Ltd – The UK Supreme Court Disapplies a Statutory Provision on the Grounds of Incompatibility with EU Equality Law Last week’s decision of the UK Supreme Court in the same-sex pension rights case of Walker v Innospec Ltd [2017] UKSC 47 generated plenty of excited commentary in the UK media. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:53 pm by Patent Arcade Staff
Walker Digital LLC v. 2K Games Inc. et alU.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:25 am by Diana L. Skaggs
Walker v.Blair 2012-SC-000004-DGE Published:  Reversing and Remanding County:     Jefferson  In Troxel v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 9:03 pm by Vinzent Will
In a series of decisions and most explicitly in West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 2:06 am by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
Additional Resources: Porsche is Blaming Paul Walker for His Fatal Car Accident, Nov. 17, 2015, By Megan Friedman, Esquire.com More Blog Entries: Joerg v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 1:53 pm by Rick Hasen
  The theory is a major equal protection stretch: it is that it violates the rights of Wisconsin voters who did not sign the Walker recall petition for the government not to affirmatively check recall petitions for duplicates. [read post]
6 May 2023, 5:25 pm by Christopher J. Walker
EPA (2022) regarding statutory interpretation and the major questions doctrine, TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:15 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a closely - - - and interestingly - - - divided opinion today in Walker v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Carson Turner
The first sign of the major questions doctrine emerged in MCI Telecommunications v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:30 am by Mila Sohoni
In that decision, in the subsequent challenge to the OSHA vaccine mandate, and in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 6:23 pm by Garrett West
Also of note is the dispute between the majority and the dissent about the precedential effect of Judge Walker’s concurrence in the judgment in United States v. [read post]