Search for: "Walker v. Unknown Party"
Results 21 - 38
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2015, 5:54 am
In other words, as Jon Snow well knows, you can’t win them all (or as the dearly-missed Ygritte might observe, “You know nothing Jon Snow”).This Game of Unknowns was on full display in a recent decision from the Middle District of Florida, Ocasio v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
Walker, 435 S.W.3d 789, 791 (Tex. 2014) (holding that a suit “against any individual employee” is a suit against the employee in his individual capacity, i.e. one that “seek[s] personal liability”). [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
Colleen V. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
Walker—was heard with its equivalent from Indiana—Baskin v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 9:08 am
In Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:51 pm
Walker. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
” County of Sacramento v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
Lord Roger, with whom Lord Walker and Lord Collins agreed, was also content to ground his understanding of persecution in a right that does expressly exist within international human rights law. [read post]
Non-final orders, jurisdiction, and fresh pasta with tomatoes, rosemary and braised kale with garlic
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, Appellee. 4th District.Mortgage foreclosure -- No abuse of discretion in ordering sequestration of rents -- Lack of standing is affirmative defense to foreclosure, and trial court should refrain from conclusively ruling on affirmative defenses in ruling on motion to sequester rentsTIDEWATER ESTATES CO-OP, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, and all other unknown parties including claimants, persons or parties, natural or corporate, or whose… [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Begging the question, does the next age in software protection belong to copyright (see Apple v Psystar, Oracle v Google)? [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
The parties granted each other reciprocal licenses to the patents at issue in that dispute, and they released and discharged each other from "any and all claims, demands or suits, known or unknown, fixed or contingent, liquidated or unliquidated whether or not asserted in the above case, as of this date, arising from or related to the events and transactions which are subject matter to this case. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:56 am
Walker, 982 F.Supp. 288 (U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 10:31 pm
See, e.g., Walker, 180 F.3d at 1071 (finding no abuse of discretion in Rule 706 appointment where the scientific evidence was "confusing and conflicting" and the appointment "assist[ed] the court in evaluating contradictory evidence about an elusive disease of unknown cause"). [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:41 pm
In both VCG and the other case lawyers are looking to, Merrill Lynch v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
Some highly experienced law of war experts inside the military would eventually conclude (following the "gap" argument about GC3 and GC4) that they should be treated instead as spies and saboteurs under GC4, but no one so far as I know suggested that they would be POWs, and the White House lawyers did not have the background knowledge really to understand that (the role of David Addington in this debate is unknown to me, but I do wonder). [read post]
