Search for: "Wall v. Social Security Administration Commissioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
"Credit: Wall Street Journal (link above).Copyright (c) 2011 by John V. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, they were well aware of the implications the decision holds for the administrative state. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 10:00 am
Reports & journal articles:Brief of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the Case O.A., et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
For example, the administration must rescind Trump-era rules that weakened protections for beneficiaries of government-funded social services by eliminating requirements that religious providers refer individuals who ask for a secular alternative and notify individuals of their rights. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:13 am
Kim Jong Nam, half-brother of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, was a CIA source, the Wall Street Journal reports. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 10:52 am
In SEC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
Examples of such obligations include the privacy and data security rules of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACTA), the Internal Revenue Code and other tax laws, federal and state consumer debt and information, electronic crime, data security and identity theft statutes; federal and state trade secret and intellectual property laws; and others, for which violations often equal or substantially exceed the civil monetary penalty liability that commonly arise… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
In October 2018, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) asked us to revise Rule 202.5(c) to read as follows: The Commission has adopted the policy that in any civil lawsuit brought by it or in any administrative proceeding of an accusatory nature pending before it, a defendant or respondent may consent to a judgment or order in which he admits, denies, or states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings.[7] I agree with the petitioner that… [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:15 pm
Patrick McDonnell summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Collins v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
On Feb. 11, after Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas was confirmed, DHS announced that it would begin Phase 1 of a program to restore processing for those individuals already enrolled. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:00 am
Supreme Court case, TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
The trial has been the subject of wall to wall media coverage. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:17 pm
Yesterday, Wikileaks chose to doxx CIA Director John Brennan and his family, releasing the entirety of his SF-86 security clearance application and all corresponding personal information, including his social security number, his home address, and the addresses of his friends and family. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
As FCC Commissioners, we are deeply concerned that Big Tech’s expansive position threatens free speech and is inconsistent with the nation’s communications regulatory framework. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am
Erin Cunningham reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
” The New York Times v CIA No.18-2112-cv, concerning whether national security cases which the president had tweeted about, brings the information at issue for FOIA requests. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
