Search for: "Walls v. The Department of Employment Security" Results 21 - 40 of 293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers should move quickly to review and update as necessary their human resources and employee benefit policies and practices concerning when same-sex partners of employees are treated as the spouses of the employees in light of the United States Supreme Court’s June 26, 2015 Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
Proving that a work-connected injury suffered as the result of an unexpected or unforeseeable event is critical to the approval of an application for accidental disability retirement benefits Suppa v DiNapoli, 2012 NY Slip Op 08622, Appellate Division, Third Department Frank J. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
When conducting these assessments, HIPAA Entities generally will want to ensure that their new enterprise risk assessment documents their consideration of the newly updated Security Risk Assessment (SRA) Tool jointly announced yesterday (October 16, 2018) by the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) and OCR, lessons shared in OCR’s $16 million Anthem, Inc. resolution agreement, $5.55 million… [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (DOL) resulting from an investigation conducted as part of an ongoing, multi-year compliance initiative by the DOL targeting oil and gas industry employers in the Southwest and Northeast as part of the Obama Administration’s tough Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) enforcement stance against employers generally. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:10 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The US Department of Labor (DOL) is appealing the November 22 Nevada v US Department of Labor ruling preliminarily enjoining DOL from implementing or enforcing a modification to the DOL Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) White Collar Exemption Regulations that would have nearly doubled the minimum salary that an employer must pay an employee on a salaried basis in reliance on the White Collar Exemption. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
See e.g., Discrimination Rules Create Risks For Employer Reliance On Injunction Of FMLA Rule On Same-Sex Partners’ Marital Status; EEOC Suit Against Pipe Fitting Business Shows Disability Discrimination Risks For Employers Hiring Vets With PTSD; EEOC Charges Employer Violated ADA By Terminating Employment At FMLA Leave End; Texas Employers Top Target For EEOC Charges; Wal-Mart Settlement Shows ADA Risks When Considering Employee Return To Work… [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Employers that sponsor group health plans that violated certain health care reform mandates for claims and appeals imposed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) will face a duty to pay an excise tax of $100 per violation per day under the expanded Form 8928 filing requirements made applicable to employers providing health plan coverage after 2013 under the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as well undermine the enforceability of claims and appeals decisions… [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:56 am
Stimson singles out represent large employers defending discrimination and disability suits, major corporations accused of price fixing, securities fraud and pollution is not because the right hand -- so to speak -- does not know what the left is doing, nor because these firms are major-league hypocrites. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 ACA litigation, including King v Burwell Self-reporting ACA violations Other topics, including cafeteria plan elections, etc. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Labor Department files suit to restore losses to the Miller’s Health Systems Employee Stock Ownership Plan Bank or other plan trustees and fiduciaries of Employee Stock Ownership Plans or other employee benefit plans holding company stock, sponsoring employers and their management should heed the new Perez v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Businesses that did not file required retirement plan returns should contact legal counsel about whether  they can come into compliance and avoid painful penalties by taking advantage of a newly announced Internal Revenue Service (IRS)  low-cost penalty relief program  for IRS penalties and a Department of Labor (DOL) voluntary compliance resolution program for Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) penalties. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am by ISAAC RICHARDSON
Beyond their four walls there are few opportunities to exercise the rights contained within the UN Refugee Convention: there are ‘no practical employment opportunities’; the support and educational services available to the children are limited; and there is no meaningful society into which they can integrate. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:36 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
It can be hard for employers to prevent their confidential information and client goodwill from following certain departing employees. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
” Relatedly, the Wall Street Journal opined that recent activity and statements by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may signal that the agency is prepared to take stronger measures against employers who retaliate against whistleblowers. [read post]