Search for: "Walsh, Inc. v. Martin*"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2016, 2:18 pm
MANGAN, SHIRLEY MANGAN, RAY LEE, and LAURA FORTUNE, Objectors and Appellants, v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 9:18 am
Real Estate Group of New York, Inc., 2009 WL 4842470 (N.Y. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 12:04 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
Member Walsh dissented. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
” ” The existence of an attorney-client relationship is an essential element of a causeof action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Lindsay v Pasternack TilkerZiegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP; 129 AD3d 790, 792 [2d Dept 2015]). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., reporting that “[l]awyers on both sides of a copyright case involving the 1980 film Raging Bull fought to an apparent draw. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Armour, Inc., 929 P.2d 340, 347 (Utah 1996); Coffman v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:07 am
An attorney who violates a disciplinary rule may be discharged for cause and is not entitled to any fees for services rendered (see Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Matter of Satin, 265 AD2d 330; Yannitelli v Yannitelli & Sons Constr. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:22 am
Inc. v Vigilant Ins. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:53 am
ICE Industries, Inc. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
NLRB v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:08 pm
Target Corporation, 2015 QCCA 1809 PIPEDA Amendments in S-4 John Stevens v Glennis Walsh, 2016 ONSC 2418 Chandra v CBC, 2015 ONSC 5303 John Doe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
(Members Schaumber, Kirsanow, and Walsh participated.) [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 6:03 pm
(see McMahon v Aviette Agency, 301 AD2d 820, 821 [2003]; Morano v Slattery Skanska, Inc., 18 Misc 3d 464, 475 [2007]). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
At Education Week, Mark Walsh reports on the court’s decision on Wednesday in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:27 am
Penguin Supermarket Inc. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Conundrum follows--yet most participants in the chattering about this remain blissfully oblivious to the analytics of that conundrum.It ought to surprise few people, then, that in this anarchic and dynamic environment, the concept of value maximization, its meaning, and its relevance remains hotly contested, sometimes as part of the debate about corporate purpose (see Brief Thoughts on Martin Lipton: "ESG, Stakeholder Governance, and the Duty of the Corporation" (Harvard… [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:47 am
Inc. v Vigilant Ins. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
In Sawyer v. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 9:06 am
See Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
