Search for: "Walter v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 898
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Walter Ng, Kelly Ng, Bruce Horwitz, and The Mortgage Fund, LLCCase number: 13-cv-00895 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: February 28, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 1, 2014 08/21/2014 11/19/2014 2014-87 SEC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
These criteria have become the focal point as the emphasis has shifted away from identifying a child’s biological relationship and towards recognizing the social, economic, and emotional ties that arise from living in a family unit together. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:49 pm by Matt Danzer
United States favors judicial discretion in severance decisions, directing courts to focus on the complexity of the case, degrees of culpability, and the facts. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:59 am by Andres
In Walter v Lane, a set of hand-written notes “involved considerable intellectual skill and brain labour”. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:59 am by Andres
In Walter v Lane, a set of hand-written notes “involved considerable intellectual skill and brain labour”. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:18 pm by Dawn Johnsen
   Half of all pregnancies in the United States (more than three million a year) are unintended. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Court held that a provision of the federal bank fraud statute which makes it a crime to “knowingly execut[e] a scheme . . . to obtain” property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank “by means of false or fraudulent pretenses” does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]
Moreover, in his opinion, these types of lawsuit violated rights guaranteed by the United States and North Carolina constitutions. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
  If a drug company, in 1995, marketed antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) for the prevention of cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States, the government might well have prosecuted the company for misbranding. [read post]