Search for: "Warner-Lambert Co. v. United States."
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
Norwich supplies a principled rationale for granting injunctions against non-parties who facilitate wrongdoing (see Cartier, at paras. 51-55; and Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2nd Cir., 2007), aff’d by an equally divided court sub nom, Warner-Lambert Co., LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
.* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 4: harmony between parties in ‘lyrical’ patent disputeLast Thursday, Jeremy reported a High Court Order obtained by Warner-Lambert (part of the Pfizer group) mandating the NHS to release guidance about the prescribing of pregabalin (Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others[2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015)) [on which see the IPKat earlier posts, here and… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:05 am
Warner Lambert Co., 309 F.3d 1373 (Fed. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:14 am
The Court set out the three factor test noted in Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm
It involved a recurring question that the Supreme Court failed to address in Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm
It involved a recurring question that the Supreme Court failed to address in Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:07 pm
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85, 94 (2d Cir. 2006)). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm
Warner Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), aff’d by equally divided court, 552 U.S. 440 (2008), attempting to distinguish Buckman Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Warner-Lambert Co., 122 Cal. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
#1 — DiCosolo v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Warner–Lambert Co., 265 F.3d 853 (9th Cir.2001) the Ninth Circuit held that attorney’s fees must be divided among all members of the plaintiff class for purposes of amount in controversy. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Warner–Lambert Co., 265 F.3d 853 (9th Cir.2001) the Ninth Circuit held that attorney’s fees must be divided among all members of the plaintiff class for purposes of amount in controversy. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
To establish a false advertising claim, Pernod must prove the following under Warner-Lambert v Breathasure (2000), that:Bacardi made false or misleading statements as to his own product [or another's];there is actual deception or at least a tendency to deceive a substantial portion of the intended audience;the deception is material in that it is likely to influence purchasing decisions;the advertised goods travel in interstate commerce; andthere is a likelihood of… [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
AstraZeneca v. [read post]
