Search for: "Washington School Dist. No. 6 v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
In 2009, the plaintiffs filed an action against the Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County which was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice three years later in light of the Supreme Court's decision in "Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The G&T programs, plaintiffs allege[*3], provide superior academic preparation, which allows primarily white and Asian students to continue through the pipeline to academically screened middle and high schools, relegating Black and Latinx students to unscreened schools, often in poorly maintained buildings with limited extracurricular programs. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The G&T programs, plaintiffs allege[*3], provide superior academic preparation, which allows primarily white and Asian students to continue through the pipeline to academically screened middle and high schools, relegating Black and Latinx students to unscreened schools, often in poorly maintained buildings with limited extracurricular programs. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
"[15] Query whether these risks could be minimized through suitable jury instructions.[16] [6.] [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
May 14, 2007).Not only that, courts applying Alabama law have rejected market share liability, Franklin County School Board v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 15, 2008 Chhay v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
” Washington v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
--Elements of Law 3.0: On the Relevance of a First Year Law Course Designed to Frame the Law School Curriculum). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
