Search for: "Washington v. Hobbs" Results 1 - 20 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am by John Elwood
Hobbs, arguing that LD-15 was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm by John Ross
He has two previous "violent felonies" under state law and eight convictions for Hobbs Act robbery. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Katie Hobbs is seeking a review of what her office alleges was “likely unethical conduct” by the state’s former attorney general, Mark Brnovich. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thus, along with Landers’s emphasis on the individual costs of free access to firearms, I would also emphasize the increased threat to the American constitutional order posed by the social and political movements represented—and carrying their arms—at Washington on January 6, 2021. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
If Virginia had not ratified, Washington could not have become president, and the constitutional project likely would have failed. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
(Christian Shepherd, "Looking to the Future: Xi Shuts the Door on the Past," The Washington Post (7 November 2021)("Only two previous leaders of China have previously  adjudicated on party history: Mao Zedong, the founder of the People's Republic, and Deng Xiaoping, the strongman leader who unleashed market reforms in 1978. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm by John Elwood
Washington, 19-333, involves whether a state can compel a floral designer to arrange flowers to celebrate same-sex weddings. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, 20-330, concerns whether business competitors of the Trump International Hotel have the right to sue the then-president under the foreign and domestic emoluments clauses. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm by Anna Salvatore
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]