Search for: "Watkins v. Smith*"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
(Wilson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:19 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Watkins-Singh, R (on the application of) v The Governing Body of Aberdare Girls’ High School & Anor [2008] EWHC 1865 (Admin) (29 July 2008) Pinnington, R (on the application of) v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police [2008] EWHC 1870 (Admin) (31 July 2008) AV & AU v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 1895 (Admin) (31 July 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Prudential Plc… [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
” Wells v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 11:30 am
Sandie v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 4:09 pm
LEXIS 175988 (SD IL, Oct. 24, 2017), an Illinois federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was not allowed to observe the Ramadan fast.In Watkins v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 10:27 am
Watkins, Case No. 142031 and People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 3:14 pm
Smith & Associates (see their flashy web page here), counsel for the defendant was Jory, Peterson, Watkins, Ross & Woolman (see their equally flashy -- but very different -- web page here), and that partner hired from Jory Peterson to go to W.J. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 6:44 am
Posted by Andrew Clubok, Blair Connelly, and Matt Rawlinson, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Saturday, April 4, 2020 Editor's Note: Andrew Clubok, Blair Connelly, and Matt Rawlinson are partners at Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Watkins v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:18 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) C, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2578 (04 November 2010) Qazi & Anor, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2579 (04 November 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) HHY Luxembourg Sarl & Anr v Barclays Bank Plc & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1248 (22 October 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Eurocall Ltd v Energis Communications Ltd & Anor [2010] EWHC 2790 (QB) (04 November 2010) Jaison Property Development Co Ltd v… [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:31 am
In Herrera v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:41 pm
In Watkins v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:29 pm
Watkins, 2007 N.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am
Garre, now chair of the appellate practice at Latham & Watkins, in Washington. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
Balthasar v Mullane was followed by the Court of Appeal again in Adams v Watkins (1990) 22 H.L.R. 107. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 7:50 am
Oyez.org's Smith v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am
At the Competitive Enterprise Institute blog, Devin Watkins suggests that after last week’s oral argument in Kisor v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
In Girouard v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
