Search for: "Watson v. U. S" Results 21 - 40 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2022, 3:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2022) (reversing district court finding that claims to “resilient” and “pliable” catheters were indefinite); U. of Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
Last week’s grant in the cell-site data case Carpenter v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:06 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Anthony,414 F.2d 1383 (CCPA 1969) (FDA, not USPTO, is responsible for safety ofdrugs which are sought to be patented); In re Watson, 517 F.2d 465 (CCPA1975) (Congress has given responsibility to FDA, not USPTO, to determinein the first instance whether drugs are safe); Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 2:55 pm
Harold Innis: Empire and Communications (new paperback edition, meaning that this book is finally back in print) Marginal Man (Watsons lengthy biography, just out in paperback from U of T press) Brief histories: Spotted these in a bargain bin for great value: A Brief History Of The Future (nothing to do with John Naughton’s book!) [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 2:19 pm
Here's what the Navy Court said in Silvernail:In People v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Partially an advertisement for IBM’s Watson data analytics and insight services (“cognitive engine”), the presentation gave a taste of things to come for pharmaceutical companies and their advisers. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
For the Georgia case’s purposes, the most relevant is Supremacy Clause immunity. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
") In 1909, the Texas Supreme Court followed Watson in the case of Brown v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:33 am
It had been driving in the same direction as Martinez's car, but then made an abrupt U-turn directly in front of Martinez's car and drove away in the opposite direction.Martinez reached Blanco's house. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 24 April 2023, Linden J granted an injunction following the hack of the claimant’s IT system in the case of Armstrong Watson LLP v Persons Unknown [2023] EWHC 921 (KB). [read post]