Search for: "Weed v. Weed"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:59 am
In Jackson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:59 am
In Jackson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:14 pm
The premise of which starts with the following: "Dude, you can't make me pull up my weed. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:14 am
Examples include (i) a registered marijuana dispensary selling non-marijuana infused baked goods to protect its brand name for edible marijuana products; (ii) registering a service mark for providing consulting and/or educational services to the marijuana industry (the services themselves are not illegal and, therefore, permitted to be registered); (iii) clothing items such as hats, t-shirts, and hoodies; (iv) stickers and pins; and (v) accessories such as pipes, e-pens, or vaporizers. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 11:37 am
The law was simply a policy preference.Justice Thomas, quoting Stewart, made the exact same argument in his dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 11:39 pm
The Appellate Division therefore held that Vaillancourt was entitled to have the decision in her favor enforced and that there was no need to go to arbitration.There was a different outcome in a grievance case with similar procedural facts [Weed v Orange County, 209 A.D.2d 627; 209 A.D.2d 628].Weed had been injured on the job and applied for leave with full pay, claiming he was eligible for such leave under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement then in effect. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:50 pm
But Los Angeles area residents can't get their weed via delivery. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:21 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:25 am
Let's further say that you're thinking about having a friend send you a huge package of weed from California in the mail.Let me give you a piece of advice in such settings. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 2:03 pm
Additional Resources: Washington et al v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:17 am
Consider for example in Casias v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:18 pm
This is a bit of an in-the-weeds question, even for Patently-O. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:29 am
” [Bunney v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:10 pm
In light of these concerns, the Court, in the landmark case of [BMW v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:26 am
He doesn't much take care of them, and in a lengthy process, the City eventually made a finding that the overgrown weeds and rubbish on his lots constituted a public nuisance that required abatement and, when Diehl refused to abate the nuisance, placed a lien on his lots for the City‘s abatement costs. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 6:22 pm
Anyway, our synthetic weed case is C.M., a juvenile v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:24 pm
Yes, the guy clearly hid his weed. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:56 am
This was the significant issue addressed in Weed v Orange County, a case decided by the Appellate Division in the early 1990’s. [read post]
