Search for: "Weintraub v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:16 am
In Weintraub v Waite, 2013 WL 6622899 (W.D.Wash.) [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 8:45 am
District Court for the District of Maryland denied summary judgment in the case of Weintraub v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
LLC v Ocean Suffolk Props. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 3:24 am
Driscoll, denying a preliminary injunction motion in Gilbert v Weintraub, Index No. 602290/15 (Sup Ct Nassau County Nov. 24, 2015). [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 8:19 am
The part-and-parcel language derives from a Second Circuit ruling, Weintraub v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:24 am
Lauderdale is assisting on the internet pharmacy case, United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:59 am
They report on the recent class certification in National Federation of the Blind v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 5:43 am
Supreme Court dismisses the claim in All Vision LLC v Paduano & Weintraub LLP 2022 NY Slip Op 30464(U) February 9, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 653605/2021 Judge: Andrew Borrok finding that Federal Court considered the gist of the documents even absent the actual paper version of either of them. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
We're the government, and we're here to copy - Blueport Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
It instead applies Garcetti and Weintraub v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Circuit, in Sottera, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
They subsequently withdrew all claims except for their allegation contending that their First Amendment rights had been violated by the Village and the other named defendants.As to Plaintiffs’ First Amendment claims, the District Court granted summary judgment in favor of all of the defendants, explaining that Plaintiffs’ First Amendment claims were barred as they were made only pursuant to the defendants’ performing official duties and thus Plaintiffs’ allegations were… [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 6:34 am
In 2010, the Second Circuit held in Weintraub v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:57 pm
However, the court concluded the date stamp controlled and certified conflict with Weintraub v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 3:41 am
Weintraub sued, only to have his petition summarily dismissed by a State Supreme Court judge. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 9:08 pm
Weintraub, 618 F.3d 94 (2d Cir. 2010).While the court is correct in its analysis, it is important to mention that Caro and the Wiretap Act both state this requirement only "where [the wiretapper] is a party to the communication or where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:34 pm
The lawsuit is an Administrative Procedures Act challenge – not a constitutional challenge - to the electioneering communications reporting requirements that were amended by the FEC in the wake of the United States Supreme Court decision in Wisconsin Right to Life v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:13 am
"The Court of Appeals said that §803(d) has not been read as a limitation on the witnesses DOI may subpoena, citing Matter of Weintraub v Fraiman, 30 AD2d 784, aff'd 24 NY2d 918.The Weintraub decision holds that DOI's inquisitorial power "reaches any person, even though unconnected with city employment, when there are grounds present to sustain a belief such person has information relative to the subject matter of the investigation. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm
linkKylie Minogue v. [read post]
