Search for: "Wells v. Smith*" Results 141 - 160 of 5,772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2006, 6:46 pm
Following the use of an article in "Poultry Science" as a prior art reference in Kemin, the CAFC utilized an article in The American Lawyer, as well as a UPI article, as 102(b) art in the case Engate v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am by Emily Coward
While it is well established that issues of law generally are reviewed by appellate courts de novo, this distinction hadn’t been articulated in North Carolina Batson jurisprudence before Hobbs. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
Hence the fight.I think that the realities of modern litigation, as well as efficiency, augur in favor of Judge Smith's position. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 8:45 am by Patent Docs
Instead, the Court may well affirm the Federal Circuit's holding that the appointment of administrative patent judges to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board violated the Appointments Clause. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:25 pm
Not only with opposing counsel in emails, but -- particularly cringeworthy -- to both the trial court and the Court of Appeal, orally as well as in writing.I get that you sometimes hate opposing counsel. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 12:13 pm
Justice Simons comes off extremely well here.Everyone agrees on the result. [read post]