Search for: "Wells v. Supervisors" Results 41 - 60 of 3,122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2014, 7:14 am by Joy Waltemath
It also argued that the state high court had not adopted Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 7:12 am by Joy Waltemath
Resolving an issue of first impression within the circuit, the Eleventh Circuit held it was inappropriate to impute a supervisor’s knowledge of his own violation of the OSH Act to his employer (Comtran Group, Inc v U.S. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
Concerned about the promotions, as well as the fellow supervisor’s questionable behaviors, the lab supervisor emailed the town’s human resources director and the city manager. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:28 pm by Joy Waltemath
” Remarks by supervisors that the interracial relationship of two correctional officers was “disgusting” and “sickening,” as well as allegations that certain workplace policies were only enforced against the couple after they started dating but were not enforced against other COs, were enough to support disparate treatment and hostile work environment claims. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:16 am by Joy Waltemath
Circuit found that the ALJ properly discredited testimony of the supervisor who claimed to have witnessed the employees sleeping well past their 10-minute break periods. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:20 am by Joy Waltemath
In so ruling, the appeals court held that an exception to its general rule regarding supervisor knowledge—carved out in its 2013 decision in ComTran Group, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 6:47 am by Joy Waltemath
” The employee and coworkers interpreted this to mean the supervisor wanted a sexual relationship with the employee, and a jury could find sexual attraction as well, the court concluded. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:48 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee presented direct evidence of disparaging remarks made by his supervisor about his, and other employees,’ use of leave, raising a question of fact as to whether the discharge decision was motivated by discriminatory animus (Ash v Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC, January 22, 2014, Steeh, G). [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Wells Fargo Alarm Service, Inc., 39 N.Y.2d 191, 196 (1976).In support of the charges, petitioner relied on the testimony of Mr. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Wells Fargo Alarm Service, Inc., 39 N.Y.2d 191, 196 (1976).In support of the charges, petitioner relied on the testimony of Mr. [read post]