Search for: "Wells v. Supervisors"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm
In Faragher v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
In the first part, published yesterday, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Southwest Airlines v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:03 pm
Pendlebury v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am
“Certainly to ask one supervisor to supervise well over 150 year seven and eight pupils was quite inappropriate and, since that led to that one supervisor only being able to glance occasionally at years nine and ten, that left those age groups effectively unsupervised. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:22 am
Having received the state high court’s answers to those questions, the Second Circuit determined that, because shift supervisors did not have a “substantial” degree of “managerial responsibility,” they were akin to general wait staff and entitled to participate in the tip pool (Barenboim v Starbucks Corp, November 21, 2013, per curiam). [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:11 am
” The employee previously had complained of discrimination to his supervisor and the sales director as well as to his coworkers. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:00 pm
Patterson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:11 am
An FLSA collective action for overtime pay by employees of a satellite installer who were classified as managers or supervisors was decertified by a federal district court in Illinois after it determined that they were not similarly situated (Hundt v DirectSat USA, LLC, July 1, 2013, Gottschall, J). [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:06 am
The employee also advanced her assault and battery claim against the employer since it was questionable whether the supervisor accomplished the alleged rape by virtue of the employer/employee relationship (EEOC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 7:39 am
In McMiller v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:24 pm
“[United States v.] [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:28 pm
Fontana Sexual Harassment Lawyer Houman Fakhimi understands that the issue in Patterson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:25 am
On October 12, an HR rep interviewed her about her complaints and she indicated the supervisor didn’t communicate well or address her professional needs, but she made no mention of sexual harassment. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:39 am
However, her Section 1983 equal protection claim failed because her supervisor was not a policymaker (Santiago v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
Moreover, the supervisor who she accused of drug use was not similarly situated since it is easier to promptly investigate a charge of drug diversion, and both state regulations and company policy recognize drug diversion as a problem requiring prompt investigation and decisive sanction (Murray v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:44 pm
In this case we consider how these rules apply to an order requiring a local legislative body, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors, to remove and replace one of its members. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 2:46 pm
Gale, P.A. // Florida Workers’ Compensation 440.15(4)(e) Termination for Misconduct Law Not Well Understood appeared first on Florida Injury Attorney Blawg. [read post]
30 May 2011, 12:28 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
Like a couple of sexting rabbits, a female employee and her male supervisor carrying on like, well, a pair of sexting rabbits. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 10:11 am
”Citing Rinaldi & Sons, Inc. v Wells Fargo Alarm Service, Inc., 39 N.Y.2d 191, Judge McGeachy-Kuls observed that in earlier OATH proceedings the presiding ALJ had ruled that "where the evidence is equally balanced, the charges must be dismissed. [read post]
