Search for: "West v. Johnson" Results 121 - 140 of 709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
” As the Appellate Division noted in Johnson v Town of Amherst, 74 AD3d 1896, having a residence in a jurisdiction is not always the same as having a domicle in that jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 8:04 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Notably, "blanket exemptions for particular types of documents are inimical to FOIL's policy of open government" (Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, 275 [1996]; accord Matter of Thomas v New York City Dept. of Educ., 103 AD3d 495, 498 [2013]; Matter of New York State Defenders Assn. v New York State Police, 87 AD3d 193, 196 [2011]), and the agency must "articulat[e] a particularized and specific justification for denying… [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 1:30 am
  The front pages told of a local construction boom: A Howard Johnson’s Motor Lodge on West U.S. 98, Gainer Funeral Home’s building on North Cove Boulevard, and the Florida State Employment Office’s new quarters on Ninth and Magnolia. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:28 am
The plaintiffs also urged application of the unique standards of linguistic precision in the drafting of royalty clauses created by the West Virginia courts in Estate of Tawney v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 11:18 am
  The Southern District of West Virginia’s order this week in McNair v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
Just the incessant pabulum of reality series and game shows, and the wild west of the internet, where all kinds of verbal behaviour run completely unchecked. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am by Law Lady
Ostendorf and making explicit findings on each factor -- Where counsel is involved in conduct to be sanctioned Kozel analysis is required before entering judicial default, and failure to do so is, by itself, basis for remandDOROTHY CHAPPELLE, CALVIN JOHNSON and EVELYN WILLIAMS, Appellants, v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Two companies in West Yorkshire have been fined by the Regulator for making nuisance calls. [read post]