Search for: "White v. Johnson*" Results 1 - 20 of 1,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2009, 2:30 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0460, 2009 MT 254, BRIANNA WHITE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:33 am by Nancy Leong
  One trenchant example is Ricci v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 3:44 pm by Steve Vladeck
As I noted then, the Attorney General’s invocation of the balancing test for due process articulated in Mathews v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:05 am by Eric Goldman
In this case, Johnson allegedly displayed copyrighted photos and videos of Paula White Ministries (the court implies it was to criticize the ministry). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am by Josh Blackman
On Monday, February 12, 2024, Professor Mark Graber published a post on Balkinization about the February 8, 2024 oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:24 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
The item has a fairly obscure title: “Prevention of Significant Deterioration/Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
Curiously, the federal Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") was not spawned by Watergate, but instead was passed in 1966, eight years before Nixon left the White House for good. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 4:23 pm
It takes a detail-oriented (and white?) [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 6:47 am by Eric Goldman
The black-and-white picture attached to the Complaint shows a male lying naked on a bed with two naked females sitting on top of the male. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 6:50 am
The event is organized by Chairperson Nannette Jolivette Brown, who oversees the Powell v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 7:03 am by Eric Goldman
, investigated and ultimately determined that “Johnson’s YouTube videos and website videos [ ] infring[ed] Paula White Ministries’ copyrights” and “there was a good faith basis to bring a lawsuit to protect [PMW’s] copyrights. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Steve Statsinger
At last - more summary orders of interest.In United States v. [read post]