Search for: "Whitney v. Whitney" Results 101 - 120 of 466
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2016, 7:30 am by Dan Ernst
The information in the docket books, which frequently includes notes of conference discussions, sheds particularly interesting new light on decisions such as Whitney v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:28 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The San Antonio Court of Appeals issued an opinion in 1998, in the case styled, Moore v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 5:04 am by Howard Friedman
Klee, (6th Cir., Feb. 14, 2019), the 6th Circuit denied qualified immunity to prison officials who refused to allow Nation of Islam members participate in the prison's Eid al-Fitr celebration.In Whitney v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 10:32 am by Anthony McCain
Steve Brachmann: First Apple Patent Challenged At PTAB Covers Touch-To-Zoom Technology Kevin Noonan: Illumina Cambridge v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:12 pm by Anthony McCain
Gene Quinn: SCOTUS Reverses Federal Circuit In TC Heartland Shawn Knight: Apple And Nokia Settle Intellectual Property Dispute Vera Ranieri: No Evidence That “Stronger” Patents Will Mean More Innovation Donald Zuhn: Biscotti v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am by Eric Goldman
by guest blogger Heather Whitney To the surprise of no one, a D.C. district court granted summary judgment for the Copyright Office in Thaler v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:43 pm by Juvan Bonni
 Stephanie Plamondon Bair: Innovation’s Hidden Externalities (Source: SSRN) New Job Postings on Patently-O: Duane Morris LLP Agilent Opus 12 Pivot Bio Hunter Clark PLLC Finch & Maloney PLLC Daly, Crowley, Mofford & Durkee, LLP Dorsey & Whitney LLP Knobbe Martens – Patent Counsel, California Cantor Colburn LLP United IP Counselors, LLC Eschweiler and Potashnik, LLC Knobbe Martens – Patent Counsel, California, DC, New York, or Washington [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
The Defendants are Whitney Chapman, individually and d/b/a Showtime Bar and Grill, and Showtime Bar & Grill LLC, also d/b/a Showtime Bar and Grill. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is not necessary that the precise legal theories presented in the first action also be presented in the second action so long as the relief is the same or substantially the same” (Swartz v Swartz, 145 AD3d 818, 822 [citations omitted]; see Whitney v Whitney, 57 NY2d 731, 732). [read post]