Finally, because the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the jury verdict of no invalidity of the '216 patent was supported by substantial evidence, we affirm the district court's denial of Microsoft's motion for JMOL of invalidity This case has a history of repeated successful appeal over a randomly competent district court judge, Rhode Island's Judge William E. [read post]

Investor William Steiner submitted a proposal at MeadWestvaco asking the company to redeem its poison pill or put it to a shareholder vote; that resolution received 79.3 percent, according to the company. [read post]

The question can be the more strongly put forth Because it is usually quite different with the U.S Supreme Court.There the practice is usually to identifyAuthor, joiner, concurrer and dissenterFrom liberals like Douglas to reactionaries like Willis Van Devanter,Or, in more modern days, Breyer or Ginsberg on the one hand,Or Scalia, Thomas or others from the right wing band.So why is it so different in the courts of appeal,Where you'd never know who's a hero, who's a heel? [read post]

Ass’n Internal Med. 1118 (2021); Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh & Bor Luen Tang, “Sustained Rise in Retractions in the Life Sciences Literature during the Pandemic Years 2020 and 2021,” 10 Publications 29 (2022). [4] Elizabeth Wager & Peter Williams, “Why and how do journals retract articles? [read post]