Search for: "Williams v. Boston Scientific Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2013, 9:59 pm
Boston Scientific Corp. case. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:59 pm
Boston Scientific Corp. case (Supreme Court docket number 12-1128). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:59 pm
Boston Scientific Corp. on Tuesday, November 5, 2013. [read post]
22 May 2013, 8:34 pm
Boston Scientific Corp. case (Supreme Court docket number 12-1128). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:59 pm
By Andrew Williams -- As we previously reported, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the Medtronic Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
Just in time for the release of CJ&D's new study on defective heart devices, medical device manufacturer Boston Scientific Corp. is warning doctors of a defect that can cause their implanted defibrillators to deliver improper shocks to the heart, and/or fail when shocks are needed.The Canadian Medical Association Journal exposes all the many myths that have driven medical malpractice "tort reform" in this country. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 5:24 pm
Williams [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:06 am
Boston Scientific Corp. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Corp. 564 F.Supp. 2d 452, 465 (E.D. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
Boston Scientific Corp., 2009 WL 4016120, at *7 (W.D. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
See In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
It is the scientific use of the imagination. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Boston Scientific and Boston Scientific v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm
Boston Scientific Corp., 2010 WL 672135, at *4 (E.D. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:21 pm
Cordis Corp., 20 No. 1 Westlaw Journal Health Law 10, Westlaw Journal Health Law May 24, 2012 Cordis Corp. has filed a notice of appeal in response to a $40 million judgment entered in favor of Boston Scientific Corp. after a Delaware federal judge doubled a jury verdict in a stent design patent dispute. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Boston Scientific (?) [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
: Boston Scientific Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
