Search for: "Williams v. Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities" Results 1 - 20 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2011, 12:46 am by Melina Padron
For an academic appraisal of the decisions, see William Schabas’ post in the PhD Studies in Human Rights blog. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:13 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
After exhausting administrative remedies by filing a complaint with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Texas Commission on Human Rights, Williams filed suit against Davis and Waffle House in April of 2003. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:00 pm by Pnina Sharvit Baruch
This is what I undertook in a recent article "The Report of the Human Rights Council Commission of Inquiry on the 2014 Operation in the Gaza Strip – A Critical Analysis," which appeared in the Israel Yearbook on Human Rights. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
“The analysis appears to be very similar to the approach that was taken in [Canada (Human Rights Commission) v.] [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:28 am
He successfully argued on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 6:28 am by Russell Cawyer
Steak and Shake Operations, the Dallas Court of Appeals held that the employee’s common law tort claims (i.e., assault, battery, and negligence) against an employer based on the supervisor/manager’s conduct were preempted by the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
" In dissent, Judge Kennedy notes that a Guidelines sentence should be presumed reasonable since the type and number of factors considered by the Sentencing Commission in its creation of the Guidelines were themselves reasonable.Webb/BookerThe start of the new year Judge Martin explained in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm by Adam Wagner
The Royal College of Nursing & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2010] EWHC 2761 (Admin) (10 November 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that a scheme which prohibits people convicted or cautioned for certain crimes from working with children or vulnerable adults breaches human rights law. [read post]