Search for: "Williams v. Quarterman"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2007, 5:43 pm
If the law were indeed clearly established by our decisions "as of the time of the relevant state-court decision," Williams v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 5:43 pm
If the law were indeed clearly established by our decisions "as of the time of the relevant state-court decision," Williams v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 5:20 am
Williams-Hubble, (11th Cir., May 28, 2010), the 11th Circuit reversed the district court and permitted an inmate to proceed with his charges that in seeking prison employment his high school diploma was rejected because he is a Muslim.In Ali v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
Quarterman, No. 07-6984. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
V. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
When Judge Frankel tried to instigate sentencing reform, it was assumed, especially not long after the Supreme Court in Williams v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Lanier, William J. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Quarterman (2007). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
Quarterman, 127 S. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
Docket: 08-674 Title: NRG Power Marketing, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Williams , No. 07-2716 Conviction and sentence for drug crimes and firearms possession is affirmed where: 1) defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel fails as district court properly held that counsel's failure to call three possible defense witnesses was not unreasonable, [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Quarterman, No. 06-10872 Denial of a habeas corpus petition alleging that a trial judge was required to recuse himself is affirmed where the state appellate court's decision denying a new trial was not contrary to, and did not involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, and therefore did not meet the structural error test requiring automatic reversal.. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Quarterman, No. 06-70024 Grant of conditional habeas relief on a claim of judicial bias from a conviction for capital murder and death sentence is vacated and relief denied where: 1) although various comments and actions by the trial judge both on and off the bench were highly improper; nevertheless, 2) under the AEDPA's highly deferential standard, a state habeas court's decision was neither an unreasonable application of controlling Supreme Court precedent, nor did it involve an… [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Quarterman, No. 07-70004 Denial of an application for a certificate of appealability following denial of habeas relief is affirmed in part, but reversed in part where, in light of the recent decision in Snyder v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, December 09, 2008 Williams v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:14 pm
Quarterman. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Quarterman, No. 03-20401 "Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a capital murder case is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) trial counsel provided ineffective representation; and 2) jury instructions given at the sentencing phase of his trial violated his constitutional rights pursuant to Penry v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
