Search for: "Williams v. Super. Ct." Results 81 - 100 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2021, 7:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Ct.) several weeks ago: The plaintiff [William Devin Howell] makes the following relevant allegations in the first count. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm by admin
The federal district court decision in the case of Bell v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
Say, for instance, that Fox, as part of its sports coverage, decides to sell video games involving the names, likenesses, and statistics of Babe Ruth, Ted Williams, Jackie Robinson, and the like. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
In Department of Fair Employment and Housing v Cathy’s Creations Inc (CA Super Ct Oct 21, 2022) the court concluded that the Department had failed to prove intentional sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Rev. 65, 113 (2006) (noting that the project “proved very controversial”). [6] William J. [read post]