Search for: "Williams v. Supreme Court of State of Cal" Results 61 - 80 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2015, 9:37 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Board of Trustees of the California State University, S199557, Supreme Court of California, 2015 Cal. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 1:20 pm by David Ettinger
The court on December 4 will hear the following cases (with the issue presented as stated on the court’s website): Bourhis v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:28 am by sally
Supreme Court Inveresk plc v Papermakers Ltd [2010] UKSC 19 (05 May 2010) Farstad Supply AS v Enviroco Ltd [2010] UKSC 18 (05 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) White & Ors v The Crown [2010] EWCA Crim 978 (05 May 2010) Cooper, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 979 (05 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Brookes v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 420 (29 April… [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 11:36 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Agencies have been admonished by the California Supreme Court against early commitments to projects in advance of environmental review (Save Tara v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:51 pm
Ford: Two of the Three Issues Raised in the Petition are Not Dependent on the United States Supreme Court's Opinion in Williams III California Supreme Court Grants Review in Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On Wednesday, May 5, 2010, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:48 am by Abbott & Kindermann
As there was no formal proceedings dealing with this issue, the appellate court concluded that this was the type of informal or ministerial decision recognized by the Supreme Court in Western States Petroleum Assn. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
State of the art was the issue that prompted the California Supreme Court essentially to exempt prescription drugs from strict liability in Brown v. [read post]