Search for: "Williams v. Thomas" Results 141 - 160 of 2,263
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 27 March 2023, Heather Williams J heard an application in the case of Kirk and Others v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
On 1 March 2023, judgment was handed down in Bukhari v Bukhari [2023] EWHC 427 (KB) by Steyn J. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm by Amy Howe
(William Hennessy) Kagan interpreted the HEROES Act very differently. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
One of Selikoff’s great achievements, the federalization of worker safety and health in the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,[3] languishes because of inadequate resources for enforcement and frivolous efforts to address non-existent problems, such as the lowering of the crystalline silica permissible exposure limit. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
(William Hennessy) Justice Clarence Thomas asked the first of many questions regarding the scope of the rule that Twitter was advancing. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 15 February 2023, judgment was handed down in McDonald v Goranko, 2023 BCSC 231 (CanLII). [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 7 February 2023, the Federal Court of Australia found in favour of Papua New Guinea energy minister William Duma in the case of Duma v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 3) [2023] FCA 47. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:28 am by Emma Snell
Ken Thomas reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]