Search for: "Williams v. United States Postal Service" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, 28% of online adults in the United States use LinkedIn, another website covered by § 14-202.5. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
I am a legal professional and I have great pride and confidence in the legal services that I perform for clients during our relationship as attorney-client. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, 28% of online adults in the United States use LinkedIn, another website covered by § 14-202.5. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm by Schachtman
See Recommendation of Special Master at 3, citing United States Postal Serv. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Court Says Postal Service Cannot Just Mail It In April 26, 2022 | Daniella Cass The D.C. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:40 am by Emma Snell
Secret Service system migration process went forward on January 27, 2021, just three weeks after the attack on the Capitol in which the Vice President of the United States while under the protection of the Secret Service, was steps from a violent mob hunting for him. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
While the postal service was a good deal more efficient than it is today, with all urban areas served by two deliveries a day and the City of London by a third, document transmission was still something of a lottery. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
This was summarised during questions to the Home Office minister in the House of Lords in 2003:Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked her Majesty's Government: Whether denying prisoners the right to vote affects their ability to persuade Ministers of the Crown and those responsible for the Prison Service to improve the conditions in which they are imprisoned; and whether denying prisoners the right to vote amounts to an additional punishment; and whether this is compatible with Article 25 of… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Haverhill, MA; Matthew Postal, President) Bay State Flag Football League Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm by Gideon
Craig Williams as they interview the founder of the Homeless Court Program and executive director of the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
  The Board also affirmed the judge's finding that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by declaring impasse over a change in the scope of the bargaining unit. [read post]