Search for: "Wolf v. Frank" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal To Help 2024 Voters, Meta Says It Will Begin Labeling Political Ads That Use AI-Generated Imagery ABC News – David Klepper (Associated Press) | Published: 11/8/2023 Facebook and Instagram will require political ads running on their platforms to disclose if they were created using artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Voting stockholders, in short, deserve to be told in a frank manner whether the nominees are expected to work as part of a balanced board, or are in fact being nominated to unbalance the board and push it hard in a particular direction. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 7:48 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
The core of the seditious conspiracy offense, as the Supreme Court held in the 1886 case Baldwin v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
" The Court identified at least five categories of appropriate actions: "to determine whether a case presented a controversy suitable for the Court's review" (Trump v .Mazars, Frank v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
  She was, however, later released with an ankle monitor.[3] The plaintiffs in the Innovative Lab v Wolf, a collection of immigrant advocacy and civil rights organizations, do not view the Migrant Protection Protocols as protective of migrants. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
  She was, however, later released with an ankle monitor.[3] The plaintiffs in the Innovative Lab v Wolf, a collection of immigrant advocacy and civil rights organizations, do not view the Migrant Protection Protocols as protective of migrants. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 6:10 am
FEC, Disclosure, Ownership, Political spending, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Shareholder rights, Transparency The Group Pleading Doctrine Following Janus Posted by Israel David, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Saturday, January 4, 2020 Tags: Class actions, Janus Capital v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  As Kersch comments, in both of these widely seen film series, “Roe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:55 am
Lozinski Posted by Gail Weinstein, Steven Epstein, and Warren S. de Wied, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Thursday, April 25, 2019 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, MFW, Supreme Court [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard oral argument in Frank v. [read post]