Search for: "Word v. U.s" Results 281 - 300 of 17,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2007, 12:44 pm
But I've always thought that, if I did, I'd call it by a single word: surreply. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 12:55 pm
He argues that the consecutive sentences: violate his rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments as explained in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:18 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 556 U.S. 129, 137 (2009), by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, see McKeever v. [read post]
A news publication named with a common English language word could not invoke the First Amendment to protect it against a trademark claim against the owner of that mark—even though the publication did not parody or otherwise intend to refer to the original mark, the U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:31 am
The best way to reflect what an opinion says is often to use its own words. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm by The Complex Litigator
Concepcion, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011) in the bank and earning interest, the new defense playbook includes a renewed, direct assault on Armendariz v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:41 pm
In other words, it will still be a litmus test, on both sides. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:43 pm
You can download the full text of Johnson here in pdf or MS Word format. [read post]