Search for: "Works v Works"
Results 1 - 20
of 106,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2014, 4:04 am
Garcia v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 7:49 am
Abdirahman v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Abdirahman v Leicester City Council and another: Ullusow v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions “When considering applications made by EU and EEA nationals living in the United Kingdom for social security benefits who were neither economically active nor self-sufficient, lawful presence in the United Kingdom was not to be equated with a "right to reside" within the meaning of… [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
In the 2011 case of Alexander Construction Ltd. v Al-ZaibakEyeglasses,[5]Alexander Construction Ltd. v Al-ZaibakEyeglasses, 2011 BCSC 590, 2011 CarswellBC 2349 (“Alexander Construction”). the British Columbia Supreme Court needed to determine, among other matters, whether the lien claimant’s provision of basic inspection and maintenance work could be considered “work” within the meaning of section 1(5) of the B.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 12:53 pm
In the case of Hilton v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:22 pm
In the case of Hilton v. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 8:56 am
The post Comparing and Contrasting Your F-1 Student Visa Work Options: OPT v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:54 am
St Prix v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 806; [2011] WLR (D) 226 “A Union citizen who, when within the United Kingdom, ceased to work in circumstances other than those set out in paragraphs (a) to (d) of article 7(3) of the Citizenship Directive was not a ‘worker’ entitled to the relevant ‘right of residence’ for the purposes of article 7(1)(a) of the Directive; and pregnancy had… [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:00 pm
In McLeod v. 1274458 Ontario Inc., an Ontario court confirmed that working notice is appropriate only for employees capable of working during the notice period. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 5:43 am
” [Pentagram] Tweet Tags: humor“New Work: ‘Coyote v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 2:53 am
Siniouguine v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm
The court decisions “Browne v Medford Multicare” and “Smith v TWA, Inc” dealt with workers who refused return to modified work. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 2:21 am
Court can hear appeal on jurisdiction point Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:57 am
(The practice was noted without disapproval in State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
Pedro v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “In order to maintain the freedom of movement or EC workers, the Department of Work and Pensions was obliged to treat a dependent family member of an EU national, who retained his UK worker status, as living in Great Britain for the dependant’s eligibility for a United Kingdom pension credit. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:07 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Elmi: [2011] EWCA Civ 1403; [2011] WLR (D) 353 “A person from abroad who had ticked a form at a job centre to confirm she was seeking work and then applied for income support satisfied the requirement in article 7(3)(c) of the Citizens Direction that she was registered as a job seeker and was entitled to income support.” WLR Daily, 18th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:01 am
R (Rowley and others) v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:55 am
Timbrell v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 701; [2010] WLR (D) 155 The Gender Recognition Act 2004 did not have retrospective effect, and since the United Kingdom had failed to implement the relevant Community law Directive within the time permitted so far as concerned acquired gender and rights to pensions, an individual could invoke the Directive as its provisions were unconditional and precise. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:12 am
Cotton v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] EWCA Civ 1330; [2009] WLR (D) 372 “Accrued holiday paid on the termination of employment constituted earnings of the same kind as ordinary pay so that an employee was treated as gainfully employed and not eligible for social security benefits in respect of earnings payable in the period starting with the first day of the benefit week in which they were paid and ending on the day before the next payment of ordinary… [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 2:38 am
Dissatisfaction with work schedules does not equal lack-of-workBlankenship v Comm. of Labor, 282 AD2d 861 Sometimes a public employer finds it necessary to hire a substitute to cover for an employee who is absent due to illness. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 1:32 pm
In the case of Federacion de Servicios Privados del sindicato Comisiones Obreras –v – Tyco, the Advocate General has held that, where an employee has no fixed or habitual place of work, time spent travelling from home to the first place of work of the day and from the last place of work of the day to home should be counted as working time for purposes of the EU Working Time Directive. [read post]
