Search for: "Wright v. Brooke Group Ltd." Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm by INFORRM
On 8 December 2011 the same judge heard an application in the case of Raab v Associated Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Brooke Group Ltd., 652 N.W.2d 159, 177 (Iowa 2002) (agreeing with Third Circuit Steamfittersdecision; o [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm by Will Baude
Brooke Group Ltd., 114 F.Supp.2d 797, 837 (N.D.Iowa 2000) (“because conspiracy requires an agreement to commit a wrong, there can hardly be a conspiracy to be negligent—that is, to intend to act negligently”); Haskin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Secondly, there was Eady J’s judgment in the case of CTB v News Group Newspapers (No.4) [2011] EWHC 3099 (QB) was made public. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Patent Baristas) (The Invent Blog) RXP keeps on growing as five more companies sign the dotted line (IAM) How patent vulnerability impacts valuation (IP Frontline) Ensuring quality patents through a rigorous review process (IP Frontline) Ocean Tomo, IP Exchange International launch OTI.com for global IP market data (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Research circles, communities of practice and IP consciousness (IP finance) Trade secrets: front and center? [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Steyn J heard an application in the case of Ince Group v Persons Unknown On 27 April 2022 Nicklin J heard a mode of trial application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure… [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Marlborough, MA; Dan Foley, President) Aastha Group, Inc. [read post]