Search for: "Wright v. Miller" Results 101 - 120 of 427
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 2:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Wright & Miller on FederalPractice and Procedure, for example, defines this term as“includ[ing] all the expenditures actually made by alitigant in connection with the action,” including “attorney’sfees. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:54 am by Bexis
”  Slip op. at 4 (citing Wright & Miller).So if you’re keeping track, Boyer is one more win for the good guys. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:54 am by John Elwood
  That list, which was appended to the government’s brief in oppostion in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm by Matt C. Bailey
See 18 Wright & Miller § 4417, at 454 (stating that preclusion is "inappropriate" when "different legal standards . . . masquerad[e] behind similar legal labels"). [read post]