Search for: "Wringer v. United States" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2008, 11:03 am
The military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (”DADT”) policy on homosexual service members is put through the wringer in Witt v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:50 am by SHG
United States, 128 S. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:45 am by SHG
When Jim Tyre sent me the decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 2:29 pm
Patent applicants owe a duty of candor, good faith and honesty to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:01 am by Broc Romanek
Judge Easterbrook then goes on to offer some interesting perspectives about the current state of Section 8 enforcement: Actually, the chance of a suit by the United States or the FTC is not even 1%. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:30 pm
And Judge Kaplan concludes with the following passage from Berger v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
” Note that no such privilege is accorded to the President of the United States and that, even when it is accorded, to members of the House and Senate, an exception is made for felonies. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm by Jeffrey Lubbers
These proposals would mainly codify some of the courts’ common law decisions or the kinds of consensus-based recommendations made by the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm by Schachtman
Green & Joseph Sanders, “Admissibility Versus Sufficiency: Controlling the Quality of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States,” . [read post]