Search for: "X Holding II, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Odd Facts Lead to Unfortunate Split Preemption Decision
29 Dec 2015, 8:07 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., -- F.Supp.3d --, 2015 WL 9026631 (S.D.W.Va. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
JB Heaton and Todd Henderson Respond: They Think Twitter's Lawsuit is a Loser
18 Jul 2022, 5:00 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In the merger agreement, X Holdings I, Inc. is known as the Parent and X Holdings II, Inc. is known as the Acquisition Sub. [read post]
ProfessorBainbridge.com - http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/
General GWiR 13 February 2009 from IP Think Tank
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP)   Europe Advocate General opines advertisement comparing perfume to L’Oreal’s did not infringe trade marks; translation issue: L’Oréal v Bellure (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) (IPKat) (Class 46) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) Advocate General opines in Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening concerning the storing and printing of small amounts of text extract from newspapers (IPKat), (IPKat) European Parliament backs… [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog
Commercial Division Allows Successor Liability Claims to Proceed on “Mere Continuation” Theory
1 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm by A. Robert Quirk, Stephen P. Younger
[x] Id. [read post]
NY Commercial Division Blog - https://www.pbwt.com/ny-commercial-division-blog/
District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss In Fraud Case
15 Dec 2011, 6:47 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
CRAFTWORK, INC. v. [read post]
Legal Malpractice Decisions - http://legalmalpracticeillinois.blogspot.com/
Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement as to Multi-Actor Patent Claim
11 May 2010, 3:28 pm by Coby Nixon
App’x 908 (Fed. [read post]
Georgia Patent Law Blog - http://www.georgiapatentlaw.com/
Obtaining damages against labor union
13 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Wally Zimolong
App’x at 200. [read post]
Supplemental Conditions - http://www.supplementalconditions.com/
Divided NLRB Rules (Again) that Dues Deductions Survive Contract Expiration
4 Oct 2022, 6:37 am by Mark Theodore and Ethan Picone
App’x 134 (9th Cir. 2020). [read post]
Labor Relations Update - http://www.laborrelationsupdate.com
Divided NLRB Rules (Again) that Dues Deductions Survive Contract Expiration
4 Oct 2022, 6:37 am by Mark Theodore and Ethan Picone
App’x 134 (9th Cir. 2020). [read post]
Labor Relations Update - http://www.laborrelationsupdate.com
Corporate Officer Escapes Corporate-Capacity Fraud Claims in Ponzi Scheme Case in Commercial Division
13 Jan 2019, 4:00 pm by Benjamin F. Jackson, Muhammad U. Faridi
[x] Id. at *5. [read post]
NY Commercial Division Blog - https://www.pbwt.com/ny-commercial-division-blog/
Corporate Officer Escapes Corporate-Capacity Fraud Claims in Alleged Ponzi Scheme Case in Commercial Division
13 Jan 2019, 4:00 pm by Benjamin F. Jackson, Muhammad U. Faridi
[x] Id. at *5. [read post]
NY Commercial Division Blog - https://www.pbwt.com/ny-commercial-division-blog/
Business Judgment Rule Applies to a Board’s Response to Take “All Necessary Actions”
3 Apr 2018, 6:10 am by A. Robert Quirk, Muhammad U. Faridi
[x] Id. at *5. [read post]
NY Commercial Division Blog - https://www.pbwt.com/ny-commercial-division-blog/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
II, § 1, cl. 5). [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
II, § 1, cl. 5). [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Split decision of CAFC in BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR v. W. L. Gore
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
App’x 747 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Federal Circuit Reverses and Remands in Crocs Appeal (2008-1596)
24 Feb 2010, 3:48 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Respondents Gen-X Sports, Inc. and Double Diamond Distribution Ltd. subsequently filed joinders to the petition. [read post]
ITC 337 Law Blog - http://www.itcblog.com
§101 Reform Bill’s Murky Language Might Do the Opposite of What It Intends, Killing Patents Upheld in Court Decisions
26 Sep 2022, 8:13 am by Holly Brezee
”[1] This folk wisdom holds true when it comes to the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2022. [read post]
Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig Blog - https://www.dbllawyers.com/blog/
Text of FACE-BOOK.COM UDRP Decision
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
See X-Copper Legal Services Inc. v. [read post]
The Trademark Blog - http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/
Apple v. Psystar: What's Up With That?
18 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
” Count II: Contributory and Induced Copyright Infringement - By selling OS X to customers for use on non-Apple hardware, and by installing OS X on non-Apple hardware, Psystar has “induced, caused or materially contributed to the infringing conduct of purchasers. [read post]
Esquire | Mac - http://www.esquiremac.com
Thursday Thinkpiece: Forcese on National Security Accountability in Canada
6 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
II. [read post]
Slaw - http://www.slaw.ca/