Search for: "YOUNG v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2016, 9:44 am by Andrew Hamm
The line for the Jingle Ball, which took place last night at the Verizon Center in downtown Washington, stretched down 7th Street and around the corner onto F Street. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:01 am
Verizon's Bell Atlantic Cash Balance Plan, Nos. 09-3872 & 09-3965 (7th Cir. 2010), recently issued a decision that saved Verizon Communications, Inc. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am by John Elwood
  The Court also may be holding Young v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
” He was also recognized as one of the most successful young litigators in America in The National Law Journal’s “40 Under 40, A Look at Some of the Most Successful Young Litigators in America. [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:39 am by Matthew Guariglia
One of those orders, aimed at Verizon, was the first document released by the journalists working with Snowden. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
There is a long tradition that democracies have of protecting their vital communications channels. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:45 am
The IP address is a unique identifying set of numbers used to direct communications through a network or the Internet. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:51 am by Marvin Ammori
(Thanks go to friends like Jack Balkin, Larry, Tim Wu, Barbara van Schewick, Yochai Benkler, David Vladeck, those at Media Access Project and Public Knowledge, as well as, primarily, the amazing team at Free Press, those at the FCC, and many many others, for making sure some young law professor wouldn't go astray.)For this post, I want to look on the bright side.First, we succeeded in many ways, factually. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
Moreover, this law applies only to misleading emails directed to Washington residents, not messages routed through WA or even "all online communications" as in ALA v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
” Six days (and three events) later, she visited Portland Community College’s Sylvania campus, where she discussed the inspiration for the book, which features young characters suffering from various disabilities. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]