Search for: "Young v. The Young Holdings Corp., Ltd." Results 41 - 60 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2010, 8:30 am by Stefanie Levine
Novopharm Ltd. the Federal Circuit explicitly found that such concealment is not a violation of the best mode, and the preference held by an inventor’s company or assignee cannot be imputed to the inventor himself in order to find a best mode violation.[35]  Although the court recognized that this holding creates a strong incentive for companies to screen their inventors of [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
Round Rock is the second-largest owner of patents among so- called nonpracticing entities, or companies that don’t sell the technology or services for which they hold patents, according to PatentFreedom, a group that keeps a database of patent holdings. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am by Marie Louise
(ArsTechnica) Ernst & Young Report: The Benefits of software IPR protection in China (IP Dragon) From phones to tablets. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Specific holdings: Under the DMCA, a lower grandfathered royalty rate is paid by some music services that were early providers of digital music transmissions. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
Ernst & Young explained the structure of Rule 26 with respect to underlying documents, calculations, and data[7]. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty)… [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Yeti By Molly Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
Ernst & Young, “Congress’s purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St… [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Associated Press – AP files seven DMCA takedowns against Drudge Retort blog over users linking to its stories: (The Trademark Blog), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (IPKat), (The Trademark Blog), ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK)… [read post]