Search for: "v. Design Center of the Americas et al" Results 41 - 60 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
At 10 a.m. next Monday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a case that implicates the constitutional authority of all three branches of the government: Zivotofsky, et al., v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, also represented Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company et al. as an amicus in support of the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
Brief in opposition of respondents Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. et al. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:00 pm by Matthew Bush
Brief in opposition of National Resources Defense Council, et al. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
(IP Dragon) Bridgestone v Bull – prior design defence in China (Class 99) Yao Ming wants to reign supreme over Yao Ming era (IP Dragon) An SME handbook for China. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionPetitioners' reply (forthcoming)Amicus brief of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence et al. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:24 pm by Steve Davies
In his latest attack on the Endangered Species Act, Hastings is trying to claim that environmental groups are getting rich from lawsuits designed to protect our most imperiled plants and animals from extinction. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am by Ron Coleman
My first involvement in litigation centered on this question was in a case called Pearson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:08 pm
Cal. 2005); Viacom International v. [read post]