Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation"
Results 41 - 60
of 884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2017, 6:28 pm
Accordingly, the court held that the plaintiff had proven his theory of inverse condemnation. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:46 pm
City of Whittier (1972) 8 Cal.3d 39 (Klopping) in order for inverse condemnation liability to arise. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 7:22 am
Both the trial court and the Court of Appeal held the City liable under inverse condemnation. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 7:44 am
Inverse condemnation litigation and liability has become a particularly hot topic in California over the last several years. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 6:00 am
While liability for the tort claims is decided by a jury, liability for inverse condemnation is determined by a judge. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 8:52 am
However, safety concerns may provide a valid defense to an inverse condemnation claim. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm
Of the seven published decisions, six were inverse condemnation cases. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
What is “inverse condemnation? [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Here’s a quick preview from Brad Kuhn and Paul Fuller on their panel topic, inverse condemnation, which is an important area for anyone involved in the eminent domain, real estate, and construction sectors in California. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Here’s a quick preview from Brad Kuhn and Paul Fuller on their panel topic, inverse condemnation, which is an important area for anyone involved in the eminent domain, real estate, and construction sectors in California: [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
LEXIS 4357), is an inverse condemnation action where the main question is this: Can you make a Code of Civil Procedure Section 1260.040 motion, also known as a Legal Issues Motion, in an inverse condemnation action? [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 8:25 pm
Property owners near Coalinga, California, are going to trial in an inverse condemnation action filed against the U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
The first trial court granted a nonsuit on the inverse condemnation claims. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
Since the California Supreme Court’s 2019 Oroville decision, which narrowed inverse condemnation liability for public agencies, several court decisions have followed suit. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:09 pm
We expect the law on inverse condemnation to continue to evolve over the next several years. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
The opinion contains a short summary of California's law of inverse condemnation related to flooding and surface water that is worth reviewing. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 4:28 pm
short podcast by Michael Berger about the recent $37 million inverse condemnation judgment against a northern California for causing the plaintiff's land to become undevelopable wetlands (Yamagiwa v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 8:44 pm
Typically, absent a physical taking of property, those construction impacts are not compensable under an inverse condemnation claim unless the property owner experiences a direct, substantial, and peculiar impact. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 4:10 pm
This case is notable because it is the first time that the Court is weighing in on a significant case concerning the doctrine of inverse condemnation since Bunch v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:53 am
The property owners sued under an inverse condemnation theory (among other things). [read post]
