Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation"
Results 121 - 140
of 884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2010, 9:39 am
Inverse condemnation complaint dismissed.Epice Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:11 pm
"Inverse condemnation" applies when the government makes no offer to buy, but takes property anyway. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:23 pm
So we all know generally how eminent domain and inverse condemnation work. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:27 pm
Instead of selling their properties, plaintiffs brought suit against the city claiming inverse condemnation. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:43 am
A “de facto” condemnation – sometimes known as an “inverse condemnation” – occurs when a condemnor’s actions cause the equivalent of a taking before a declaration of taking is filed. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:25 am
Accordingly, plaintiffs failed to allege an inverse condemnation cause of action, and the demurrer was properly sustained by the trial court. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:50 pm
Plaintiffs’ petition included three causes of action: Count I alleged inverse condemnation under Missouri state law, Count II asserted inverse condemnation under the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 10:32 am
To prove inverse condemnation, a plaintiff is required to show three elements: 1. [read post]
29 Oct 2006, 12:50 pm
The matter was ordered for re-trial on the issue of inverse condemnation, if any, and damages. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:41 am
Inverse Condemnation - Generally speaking, the government will pay just compensation to a landowner before officially taking their property. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 10:05 am
This is an example of inverse condemnation. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:01 am
Here's the latest inverse condemnation opinion from the Wisconsin Supreme Court in a case involving overflights from an adjacent airport. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:01 am
The first involves a question of public use, the second inverse condemnation, and the third valuation. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 11:17 am
As it explained, the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action for inverse condemnation or de facto appropriation because he didn’t allege any restraint on the use of his own property. [read post]
24 May 2008, 2:37 pm
" The decisions by these courts are worth following because the CFC is the Article I court that has exclusive nationwide jurisdiction over regulatory takings and inverse condemnation claims against the federal government seeking monetary damages in excess of $10,000. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
On April 17, the Eastern District of California issued two separate decisions dismissing two separate inverse condemnation claims with prejudice because the plaintiffs did not have an independent property interest in the subject property. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:33 pm
Second, it misunderstood the concept of inverse condemnation, using it not as a remedy for property owners but as a sword by which the government can circumvent the Constitution and the Eminent Domain Act and usurp property without paying. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 3:01 am
Borough of Avalon, the decision from New Jersey's Appellate Division which held that the government can assert inverse condemnation in order to take property without compensation. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:00 pm
A-49-09 (certification granted Nov. 10, 2009), to review the decision from New Jersey's Appellate Division which held that the government can assert inverse condemnation in order to take property without compensation. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 9:12 am
Here are the latest opinions of interest from the Court of Federal Claims, which has nationwide jurisdiction over inverse condemnation and regulatory takings claims against the federal government where the compensation sought exceeds $10,000: Energy Security of America Corp. v. [read post]
