Posts tagged with: "1875" Results 381 - 400 of 799
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2014, 1:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
General Railroad Right-of-Way Act of 1875. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:19 pm by Julie Deisher
United States [SCOTUSblog backgrounder; JURIST op-ed] that a right of way granted under the General Railroad Right-of-Way Act of 1875 [Cornell LII backgrounder] is an easement which can be terminated by the railroad's abandonment, leaving the underlying land unburdened. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:53 am by Lyle Denniston
The transfer was made under the terms of the 1875 law, and the Brandts were told that a railroad which crossed their land would have use of the right-0f-way until it was surrendered. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:42 am
In 1875, an amendment provided that state revenues expended “for the purposes of education” had to be spent exclusively on free public schools. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:18 am by pscamp01
The Civil Rights Cases is a name given to five cases that were filed in response to violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1875. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:18 am by pscamp01
The Civil Rights Cases is a name given to five cases that were filed in response to violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1875. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:41 pm by Federalist Society
The question in the case is Whether the United States retained an implied reversionary interest in rights-of-way created by the General Railroad Right of Way Act of 1875 after the federal government granted the lands underlying the right-of-way to a private party. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:41 pm by Federalist Society
The question in the case is Whether the United States retained an implied reversionary interest in rights-of-way created by the General Railroad Right of Way Act of 1875 after the federal government granted the lands underlying the right-of-way to a private party. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:26 am by Dennis Crouch
Ryer, 91 U.S. 150, 157 (1875) ("The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not."). [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 6:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
Ryer, 91 U.S. 150, 157 (1875) ("The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not."). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 2:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ryer, 91 U.S. 150, 157 (1875) (“The inven-tor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses towhich it can be put, no matter whether he had conceivedthe idea of the use or not. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 10:27 am by David Markus
Here, the patent did not reserve any interest in the 1875 Act -­ JUSTICE SCALIA: Counsel, you are not reading this, are you? [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:46 am by Eric Turkewitz
Here, the patent did not reserve any interest in the 1875 Act -­ JUSTICE SCALIA: Counsel, you are not reading this, are you? [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:46 am by Theresa Donovan
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF] in three cases Tuesday, including a case on the General Railroad Right-of-Way Act of 1875 and a case on whether certain employee severance payments are taxable. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
This case is basically about a series of federal laws — the most important, apparently, an 1875 statute — that represent the sometimes meandering policy of Congress in giving away the public lands for railroad development. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The 1875 Act was designed primarily to replace a case-by-case grant of rights-of-way to railroads. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:49 pm by Barbara Bavis
  For public laws passed before 1875, you can visit our A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation site. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 8:33 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
 Probably not.There is circumstantial evidence to suggest why the Administration of President Chester Arthur may have wanted the Civil Rights Act of 1875 invalidated. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 11:09 am by Dorsey
  The non-compete laws of Montana are strikingly similar to those of California and North Dakota and originated with the Field Code which California adopted in 1872 and Montana adopted in 1875. [read post]