Posts tagged with: "206"
Results 3441 - 3460
of 4,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2011, 10:00 am
Additionally any such infringement action against the use of festive terms such as SANTA CLAUS or FATHER CHRISTMAS would be unlikely to even get off the ground because the use of these signs in a Christmas card or other festive greeting would not be liable to affect or be liable to affect one of the essential functions of a trade mark following the reasoning of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-206/01 Arsenal v Reed. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 4:45 am
Today marks the Blog’s last original post of 2011 (if you count a weekly summary as original content). [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 1:52 pm
For more information and a FREE CONSULTATION, give me a call at (206)285-1743. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
In der Medienmitteilung Nr. 206/2011 des BGH heisst es dazu: Der Grundsatz, dass „die Gedanken frei“ und dem staatlichen Zugriff nicht zugänglich sind, beschränkt sich nicht allein auf innere Denkvorgänge, sondern erfasst auch ein in – unbewussten oder bewussten, unwillkürlich oder willkürlich geführten – Selbstgesprächen formuliertes Aussprechen von Gedanken, bei welchem sich die Person als „allein mit sich selbst“… [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:55 pm
For more information and a FREE CONSULTATION, contact me at (206)285-1743. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:53 pm
Please be careful on the roads this holiday season, but if you are injured by another driver’s negligence, call us at (206)285-1743. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:05 am
Robert has also just told the Kat that there is another similar reference by the Bundesgerichtshof, Stofffähnchen II, I ZR 206/10, which was forwarded to the Court of Justice of the European Union by decision of 24 November 2011 (there's a German-only press release on this case here. [read post]
N.D.Cal.: No REP in a university owned computer where defendant was warned of no privacy in computer
20 Dec 2011, 9:13 pm
Simons, 206 F.3d 392, 398 (4th Cir. 2000) (holding that government employee’s belief that his computer files were private was not objectively reasonable where the employer’s policy reserved its right to “audit, inspect, and monitor” his computer files); United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:04 pm
For more information and a free consultation, call me at Premier Law Group at (206)285-1743. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:22 am
For more information and a FREE CONSULTATION, contact me at Premier Law Group today at (206)285-1743. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:45 pm
Id. at 206–07. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:53 pm
For more information and a FREE CONSULTATION, contact me at Premier Law Group at (206)285-1743. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:31 am
Doe, 370 S.C. 206, 634 S.E.2d 51 (2006). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:37 pm
** For more information or to sign up to volunteer for one or more of the evenings, contact Mock Trial Attorney-Judge Coordinator Jenny Keystone at (510) 206-7366 or mokstone@gmail.com. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:36 pm
Super. 199, 206 (App. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:19 am
Además de las multas excesivas estipuladas en el decreto, hasta 2 millones 392 mil 800 pesos[1] (art. 232 fracción I), hay problemas más graves que son contrarios al orden constitucional, uno de ellos se encuentra en la reforma al segundo párrafo del artículo 206 de la Ley de Propiedad Industrial que queda de la siguiente forma: Si se negara el acceso del personal comisionado a los establecimientos a los que se refiere el párrafo previo o si de… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 1:33 pm
., 214 S.C. 206, 51 S.E.2d 749 (1949), the plaintiff was was injured from fragments of glass after one of four bottles she picked up exploded. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:14 am
By David Banks Hawaii’s Act 206, which provides employment protections for victims of domestic and sexual violence, becomes effective January 1, 2012. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:58 pm
Here in California, the crime of torture (Penal Code, § 206) occurs when an individual, acting “with the intent to cause cruel or extreme pain and suffering for the purpose of revenge, extortion, persuasion, or for any sadistic purpose, inflicts great bodily injury” on the person of another. [read post]
