Posts tagged with: "206"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 4,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 3:47 pm
Defense Infrastructure: The Navy Needs Better Documentation to Support Its Proposed Military Treatment Facilities on Guam, GAO-11-206, Apr 5, 2011... [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:44 am
The recalled trucks have the model numbers 153-210, 206-110, or 506-110C. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 12:37 pm
Model number 153-210, 206-110, or 506-110C is printed underneath the truck. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
However, rule 206(4)-5 and section 208(d) of the Advisers Act prohibit doing anything indirectly which would be prohibited if done directly (see rule 206(4)-5(d)). [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 9:00 pm
We will walk a total of 206 miles, typically walking 15-18 miles per day. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 12:07 pm
§ 206(a)(1) (providing minimum wage amounts); 29 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 10:24 am
Just drop me an email, or call my cell, 206 321 3627. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:55 am
Regina v Taylor (George Charles) [2011] EWCA Crim 728; [2011] WLR (D) 108 “Records kept on computer that affected or related to a company’s property or affairs were within the composite expression ‘book or paper affecting or relating to the company’s property or affairs’ within section 206(1)(c) of the Insolvency Act 1986. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
According to the jurisprudence of the boards of appeal the standard of disclosure for this requirement is that it must be possible to reproduce the invention on the basis of the original application documents without any inventive effort and undue burden, whereby the skilled person may use his common general knowledge to supplement the information contained in the application, textbooks and general technical literature forming part of the common general knowledge (see e.g. decisions T 629/05, T… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
More on Pay-to-Play In recent editions to our Legal News: Investment Management Update, we summarized the new SEC pay-to-play rule (Rule 206(4)-5 or the Rule), which required compliance (starting on March 14, 2011) by registered and exempt investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:00 am
Or you can call her at (206) 280-4165 or email her at Cjliu@MyWholeLife.net.Here is the transcript....Today with me is Cj Liu. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:00 pm
” [206-207] The media controversy that surrounds injunctions is likely to continue and it is thus possible to foresee ‘media-friendly’ MPs attempting to circumvent the secrecy of injunctions on a more regular basis. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
” [206-207] The media controversy that surrounds injunctions is likely to continue and it is thus possible to foresee ‘media-friendly’ MPs attempting to circumvent the secrecy of injunctions on a more regular basis. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
Downey, 206 N.J. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:03 am
§ 206(a)(1)(c). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:46 am
Highlights from the DealBook newsletter. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Below, I have collected some of the case law and commentary on the issue of using relative and attributable risks to satisfy plaintiff’s burden of showing, more likely than not, that an exposure or condition caused his or her disease or injury. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 4:51 am
Click here for full list. 1 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara CA $192,020.00 4,130 189 2 2 San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City CA $167,130.00 9,790 149 3 3 New York-White Plains-Wayne NY-NJ $166,130.00 51,580 580 9 4 Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine CA $157,950.00 6,380 206 2 5 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale CA $155,120.00 25,350 359 4 6 Modesto CA $153,540.00 530 1 0 7 Wilmington DE-MD-NJ $153,520.00 2,120 25 1 8 Washington DC-MD-VA $152,230.00 37,970 146 7 9 … [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Lindsey was 18 when charged and jurisdiction to file the charges by information was found in § 41-5-206, MCA STATE v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:36 am
The plaintiff and his wife held title to the subject property as tenants by the entirety and were, thus, each seized of the whole property (see Kahn v Kahn, 43 NY2d 203, 206-207; Stelz v Shreck, 128 NY 263, 266; Paterno v CYC, LLC, 46 AD3d 788, 789). [read post]
