Posts tagged with: "30" Results 3201 - 3220 of 241,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2010, 9:55 am by Mitch Jackson
  Steve did not claim any medical specials or wage loss, and after a 9 day trial and 2 days of deliberation, the jury returned an astounding verdict of $30 million in non economic damages. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:42 pm by Joe Palazzolo
Home run king* Barry Bonds was sentenced to 30 days house arrest for providing evasive testimony to a federal grand jury investigating doping in sports. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 6:47 am by Terry Hart
• • • Friday’s Endnotes – 08/30/13 was originally posted on Copyhype • • • [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
And finally The leading claimant law firm, Schillings, is 30 years old and has marked the anniversary with a piece on its website by Keith Schilling “Three decades of libel, privacy, defamation and reputation” Data Protection The French Data Protection blog, Donnees personelles has the slides of a talk given (in English) by its editor Thiébaut Devergranne,: “Data Protection:new directions from Europe”. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Events 30 April 2012, 6.30pm: Lessons for Leveson: What can we learn from press regulation elsewhere? [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Events 30 September 2020, 5RB Conference, IET Savoy Place. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 4:59 am by Legal Profession Prof
A six-month suspension with all but 30 days deferred has been ordered by the Louisiana Supreme Court for neglect and false statements. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:57 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Michigan Attorney Discipline Board reduced a 30-day suspension to a public reprimand, overturning some of the misconduct findings of a tri-county panel. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 9:11 am by Legal Profession Prof
A partially stayed three-month suspension with 30 days of actual suspension was imposed by a single justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:07 am by Legal Profession
The Minnesota Supreme Court has suspended an attorney for at least 30 days with reinstatement on probation for five years. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:33 am by Legal Profession
The illinois Review Board has recommended a 30 day suspension of an attorney for false or misleading statements concerning her disciplinary record on a blog, in connection with her candidacy for judicial office Respondent's act in drafting and sending the... [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:20 am by Legal Profession Prof
The representation of difficult clients in civil litigation resulted in the reprimand of an attorney who had 30 years experience with no prior discipline. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:51 am by Legal Profession
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has suspended an attorney for 30 days, with the possibility of a fully-stayed sanction. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:13 am by Legal Profession Prof
A 30-day suspension has been imposed by the Virginia State Bar based on an agreed disposition. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:39 pm by Legal Profession Prof
A suspension of at least 30 days was imposed by the Minnesota Supreme Court of an attorney who sought a settlement for a victim/witness in a criminal case. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:50 am by Legal Profession Prof
An attorney who allowed a civil claim to be dismissed and fabricated a settlement with the client should be suspended for 30 days, according to a recent report of the Illinois Review Board. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:28 am by Legal Profession Prof
A traffic stop led to a stayed 30-day suspension and probation imposed by the Indiana Supreme Court On June 14, 2011, Respondent was stopped by the police while operating a motor vehicle with a burned-out headlight. [read post]
10 May 2017, 7:09 pm by Legal Profession Prof
A private reproval was imposed by the California State Bar Court Review Department On June 30, 2014, respondent went to the hospital for treatment for alcohol problems. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 8:18 am by Legal Profession Prof
A 30-day suspension with fitness has been imposed by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals based on findings that the attorney violated Rules 3.1 and 8.4(d) through a pattern of baseless and frivolous litigation. [read post]