Posts tagged with: "Citizens-United-v.-FEC"
Results 421 - 440
of 782
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm
Recently, in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:01 am
Here is the (short) abstract: This paper criticizes the abstraction of Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
The uniting thread among the various factions within the Progressive Movement was the view that government in the United States had become systematically corrupt. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:33 am
Bennett (echoing the pre-CU decision in FEC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 1:08 pm
The amendment, a response to last year’s Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v FEC, grants Congress and the states the power to “regulate the raising and spending of money and in kind equivalents” in their laws for their respective elections. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:04 pm
By Mark Hays, Campaign Coordinator for Public Citizen’s Democracy is for People Campaign, which is building public support for a constitutional amendment that would address the impact of Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
” In the New York Times, Steven Greenhouse reports that labor unions have reacted to the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:34 am
Supreme Court’s Citizens United v FEC ruling. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:03 am
The title of the article is deliberately provocative and signals its identification of Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:11 am
by Jonathan Arogeti Those who dissented in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:17 am
While the ICGN’s purview is a global one, we believe this matter is particularly relevant in the United States given last year’s Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:02 am
At the same time, the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:01 am
Holahan case in FEC v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 4:18 pm
More robust disclosure of corporate political spending is of interest to investors, noted the ICGN, and is particularly relevant in the United States given last year’s Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:13 pm
” Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:48 am
The Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:07 am
In Bluman v FEC, the court upheld 2 U.S.C §441(e)(a), which prohibits contributions from individuals living in the U.S. but not admitted for permanent residency. [read post]
