Posts tagged with: "ECPA"
Results 561 - 580
of 755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 11:31 pm
Much to my surprise, the room was pretty packed; I didn’t know there were so many people who know what ECPA is, much less that care about its reform. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:07 pm
Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) was passed in 1986 and hasn't been substantially updated since. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:48 pm
” “ECPA reform is a win-win: It benefits consumers, law enforcement, and businesses. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:39 pm
“Since the Electronic Communications Privacy Act was first enacted in 1986, ECPA has been one of our nation’s premier privacy laws,” Leahy said in a statement. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:09 am
I'm somewhat surprised at how easy the court's conclusions seemed on the ECPA and SCA claims. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:26 pm
(Orin Kerr) For those in the DC area who love ECPA — and isn’t that most of you? [read post]
11 May 2011, 2:36 pm
" Leahy added that he would “soon” introduce an update to ECPA that will rectify that problem. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:00 am
Related Links “Record Number of Americans Targeted by National Security Letters,” by Sanchez “The Strange Case Against ECPA Reform,” by Sanchez “Apple, The iPhone And A Locational Privacy Techno-Panic,” by Adam Thierer To keep the conversation around this episode in one place, we’d like to ask you to comment at the web page for this episode on Surprisingly Free. [read post]
7 May 2011, 6:30 am
(Stewart Baker) James Baker of the Justice Department recently testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee about ECPA reform, and in the process he touched on the provision of ECPA that prohibits ISPs from sharing subscriber data with the government in the absence of a court order. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:30 am
. * the judge wonders if the ECPA preempts the CA Penal Code 631 claim * the judge is skeptical of the common law trespass to chattels claim because the plaintiffs didn't allege any meaningful impairment to their computers * as usual, the unjust enrichment claim isn't a standalone claim. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 7:57 am
Ariana R. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 12:04 pm
The court rejects the ECPA claim (which 230(c)(2) doesn’t immunize) because Holomaxx didn't explain clearly enough how the email service provider "intercepted," "used" or "disclosed" Holomaxx's email or how the ESP improperly accessed stored communications. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:01 am
Second, Congress has failed to meaningfully revise the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) for over a quarter century. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 11:59 am
Neither bill would displace current privacy laws applicable to health, educational, credit and financial records, debt collection, children’s online data, or the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 11:44 am
Neither bill would displace current privacy laws applicable to health, educational, credit and financial records, debt collection, children’s online data, or the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Baker argued that Congress should be cautious about reforming the ECPA. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:11 am
Doesn’t apply to IP claims or ECPA/state law antiwiretapping equivalents. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 7:57 am
Senate's ranking members from several groups urging amendment of ECPA to comply with the Fourth Amendment in the digital age: Dear Chairman Leahy and Ranking Member Grassley: As public interest groups dedicated to limited, Constitutional government, we write to urge Congress to extend the Fourth Amendment’s protections to Internet-based “cloud” and mobile location services. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:33 pm
At the time, ECPA was a cutting-edge piece of legislation. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:15 pm
You remember ECPA? [read post]
